Steyr and M16

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian Defence was checking out the new Army website tonight for the latest developments.

The website has been under construction the last few months and even now, after it went live, the site remained under development.

As usual I checked the Buletin TDM, now operating from another IP address, for the latest news but to my chagrin, the featured bulletin was published in May. Perhaps the BTDM is a tri-monthly magazine.

Anyhow, one article stood out. It is called “Rancangan Perlaksanaan” (Plan of Implementation). I am not sure whether the current Armed Forces chief Jen Abdul Aziz Zainal was the author or not, but his quote was placed on top of the article. The translation was credited to Major Zulkifli Dato Tahir.

To me the article was not that interesting (it was too academic) but the pictures that were used to illustrate it, speaks volumes of the current conundrum on the selection of a standard assault rifle for the Army and the rest of the Armed Forces.

The editors used 17 pictures for the article and 14 of those were soldiers with rifles. From the 14, only two were those of the Steyr AUG and the rest were those of the M161A1.

The BTDM editors have lots of photos in their file, and being responsible for the image of the Army, it is certainly their job to promote the service, therefore the latest and greatest equipment would have the been the natural choice.

Instead they choose to highlight that the Army, which in 1994 replaced the M16A1 with the Steyr, is still issuing rifles that should have been in store.

I know, perhaps I am reading too much into the pictures and making my own assumptions to fit my thinking but hear me out here.

The Army wants the latest version of the M16/M4 to replace the Steyr. Technically they did, in April 2006. But unforeseen reasons, some claimed it was the interference of the US Department of Defense and State Department but until now the Army have yet to be issued with the latest and greatest.

So one year on, the Army, either knowingly or not and through subordinates (yes, I am being a psychologist!) continue to tell the world that it needs the Black Rifle.

Otherwise, the Army would have stopped its units from issuing M16s to soldiers. With the delay in the M4 procurement, wouldn’t you think the Army should have opted for another assault rifle to replace the Steyr by now?

–Malaysian Defence

If you like this post, buy me an espresso. Paypal Payment

Share
About Marhalim Abas 1629 Articles
Shah Alam

6 Comments

  1. what’s the reason for the change, hope you could explain. How many years steyr had been used by the M’sia army

  2. I vote for HK416 assault rifle. Why does TDM not choosing this rifle? Much more reliable than M16/M4 family.From what I’ve read, the price not much differ.

  3. There have been horror stories regarding jams in Afghanistan with the M4. Why not go for the HK416? I think there’s also an option to convert M4s to HK416 be replacing the upper, etc. The HK416 is also quite cost effective if I’m not mistaken.

  4. Salam.
    M16A1 are good and reliable assault rifles, if not for the new NATO SS109 5.56mm round and as long as they are properly serviced, The M16A1 will take care of it’s user in battle. On the other hand the Styer AUG rifles were said to be a political buy, according to some sources. An M16A2 cost only half of the Styer rifle. 20 odd years of service use is considered very short for an assault rifle system be it the M16A1 or Styer rifle taking into consideration the investments made into the weapon’s purchase.
    Why we are buying the A4 rifles is puzzling, as we should wait a few more years as the US military are doing research into replacing the current rifle calibre of 5.56mm which is considered lacking stopping power on the enemy personnels due to it’s light bullet. 6.8mm SPC is considered the next calibre ammunition dor NATO and US military forces, as it has the right bullet weight, ample trajectory and range and soldiers can still use the present M16 type magazines.
    Why is the Styer rifles being replaced after only 22 years of service in ATM, where as the Australian Defence Forces are still using them and have made many modification and improvements to their Styer, for example the addition of ghe Picattany rails for the use of better aiming sight systems?

    Captain (Bersara) Ridzlam RAMD

  5. The Steyr Saga was revealed in detail previously but has been lost to the Crash of 2015. The story can be retold…. if admin agrees.

    Reply
    I’ll put up your M4 story once I got the stories which were lost.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*