X

Dong Feng Prime Movers For The Army?

SHAH ALAM: Dong Feng prime movers for the the Army. In the last two quarters of 2019, the Defence Ministry published a slew of request for bids for various equipment and weapons as part of the Army’s Recapitalisation Programme. The numbers are small I must admit but according to my sources that it was the biggest procurement exercise for the Army for a decade or so.

Anyhow its already about six months since of all the tenders were published, it is likely that some of the request for bids have been decided and the winning bidders selected. Unfortunately, although the RFB were openly published the results are nowhere to be seen. I appreciate that all government tenders are open for competition nowdays but it is striking that the results – the ones that really matter the most – equipment and weapons – are not made public. Of course the less sexy ones – mostly services – are made public. Please note that this is not limited to the Defence Ministry only as the results of some important tenders for other ministries have also not made public, leading to this one .

An Army Iveco prime mover.

I am guessing at least for the Defence Ministry that most of them – equipment and weapons – will only made public when the contracts are signed at DSA 2018 this April. The ministry and the minister himself probably want the publicity generated for the contract signings at the show itself. Lets hope the full details of the contracts signed will be published as well and not like in the past where I had to corner the emcee to get anything worthwhile to write about it (this happened a few times at DSA and LIMA shows)

Volvo Heavy Recovery Vehicle from 1 Workshop. The unit is now with Fourth Mechanised Brigade.

Anyhow I was told that the three Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT) tender was won by a company offering a Dong Feng prime mover. I was not told the exact model but checks on the Dong Feng Malaysia showed there were three models of prime movers that could have been offered for the contract. Before anyone says why China made trucks, it must be noted that the Army had previously bought trucks and prime movers from Romania though it was through a Malaysian company, Pesaka Astana. Most of these vehicles, however, have been replaced by Iveco, MAN and other trucks within the last 10 years.

Iveco 5 tonne GS trucks of the Depo Simpanan Pertahanan (Defence Storage Depot) being readied for deployment at the height of the 2014 floods. Internet.

Does this mean Dong Feng was also selected for the other vehicle tenders? I have no idea at the moment but hopefully I will find out more in the near future. Anyhow the new 4X4 anti-tank guided weapon carriers being sought by the Army – will also have new weapons on them. The Defence Ministry published the RFB for the medium range ATGW on Jan. 24. The tender which is restricted will closed on February 18. I have no idea whether these will be replacing the Metis-M in service. It is likely though as those in service are already some 20 years old already.

Metis-M ATGM on the way at the 2017 Firepower exercise.


— Malaysian Defence

If you like this post, buy me an espresso. Paypal Payment
Marhalim Abas: Shah Alam

View Comments (31)

  • With Made in China defence equipment being acceptable now would MINDEF be ok to consider the J10 for the LCA too. J10 has become a surprise attendee in the Singapore air show n would be doing flying displays

  • Prolly more Baktar shikan from pakistan. what's a couple of ATGM for millions of tons of palm oil anyway?

    While we're at it, Deftech prolly should send people to see how they made Al Khalid tank as well

  • I will just say they are going to regret it sooner rather than later. The only reason logistic companies are still using them is cuz they are cheap to buy more as spare and easily replace when expended. Typical China trucks don't last > 5 years of constant use. Can ATM afford for such option? They shouldn't just look at the pricing and pick the lowest bidder. What I was afraid will happen has came true.

  • Michael,

    Bakhtar Shikan is a copy of Red Arrow which in turn is a copy of TOW 1. Why on earth would we buy a SACLOS bulky system designed in the 1970’s when there are are newer and better performing systems in the market?

  • @ joe

    In the army, lorries (trucks are for americans) are sparingly used, unlike civilian owned lorries. Army lorries would be more likely to broke down with broken oil seals due to infrequent use rather than parts being worn out by daily hard use.

    On pakistan...

    There are items other than the bakhtar shikan for us to get. For example
    - more RPG-7 rounds
    - RPG-7 training rounds
    - Heavy Industries Taxila (HIT) assembled SH-15 155mm wheeled SPH
    http://21stcenturyasianarmsrace.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/chinese-sh15-155mm-truck-howitzer-ideas-2018.jpg
    http://pbs.twimg.com/media/EP79PvXVAAAF6Q7.jpg
    http://pbs.twimg.com/media/EP79TSzU0AE7K_P.jpg
    http://pbs.twimg.com/media/EP79V5CUYAE51QO.jpg

  • @...
    Vehicles will deteriorate quicker if left out in open and only used sparingly. Unsurprisingly, China truck parts (ie seals, rubber lining, weatherstrips, etc, ECUs, other electronic equipment) do wear out faster compared to Japanese & Conti trucks even when left alone.

    @Lee Yoke Meng
    Not so bad if we have spare trucks to replace with, otherwise ATM will suffer downtime when they are needed. In logistics, it only concerns goods late delivery, in Armed Forces it could be life and death.