X

Here We Go Again LCS

BNS workers posed for pictures with Maharaja Lela at her launch in August, 2017 The workers are under strict order not to share the pictures of the ship during the construction.

SHAH ALAM: Here we go again. It appears that the government is considering its options to save the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) project. Defence Minister DS Ismail Sabri told Parliament today that they were looking at three options to salvage the project to ensure the completion of the ships

He said the first option was to appoint Naval Group of France (currently subcontractor ) as the rescue contractor to salvage of the project through a deed assignment from Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS) – the company holds the contract for the project – using the balance of funds from the ceiling cost of the contract (RM9 billion) to complete at least two ships.

LCS PCU. Maharaja Lela. Her name could be seen on the stern. Picture taken on Aug. 25. 2017.

The second option was to allow BNS to complete the project with the balance of funds from the ceiling cost (again RM9 billion), to ensure at least two LCS are completed.

The keel of the LCS 3 with the Maharaja Lela in the back at the ceremony in December, 2018.

The third option was to cancel the contract with BNS altogether and the government salvaging the project. The third is similar to the one taken by the government when it appointed BNS to revive the NGPV project.

The keel of LCS 3 (left)and LCS 2 (right) in the ship building hangar at BNS last December, 2018.

Ismail also confirmed that the government had already paid RM6 billion to BNS. This was also revealed by the previous Defence Minister last year.

One of the mounting for the proppeler shaft of the LCS,

Based on the schedule, he added two of the LCS should be delivered already. However as of 31 July, 2020 not a single ship has been completed with the progress of the project at 56.7 per cent compared to the original schedule of 85.73 per cent, a delay of 29.06 per cent or 31.1 months.

The progress of the 1st LCS as posted on Twitter by the RMN LCS team in 2016.

The current status of the ships are LCS 1) 59.79 per cent; LCS2) 48.09 per cent ; LCS3) 43.75 per cent ; LCS4) 36.49 per cent and just 20 per cent on the LCS5. Work has not started at all on LCS6 as the current status as revealed by Ismail was 0 per cent.

The LCS major equipment detailed. RMN graphic

Ismail also said that the government will not pay BNS debts although the company had requested for it.
“However, the government will pay for the rights of the design and the completion of the detailed design while at the same time we are claiming the rights for the blocks and hulls and other equipment of the LCS already purchased by BNS as the government had already paid RM3 billion for them.

A graphic promoting the keel laying ceremony of the first LCS. RMN

What ever the steps taken to revive the project, Ismail said it will not affect the contributions and funds of the Armed Forces Provident Fund (LTAT) which subsidiaries are involved in the project.

Analysis
It is clear from the above the NGPV fiasco has been repeated as I had predicted on various posts. Again, I am not celebrating that my prediction came true, far from it. It must be noted that Ismail did not explained why they chose for two ships to be completed for two of the options. I am assuming that this was because the two ships are already joined (we know one is already joined) together with others are long way off from being completed. The keel of the sixth has not been laid down yet! It is also likely that the funds for the four will come from RMK13! I must say much of the blame for the fiasco should be laid on the politicians who insisted that all six ships be built locally instead of choosing the prudent route of getting one built by Naval Group in France. They also failed to supervise the project to ensure that the little amount of funds we reserved for national security are prudently spent.

— Malaysian Defence

If you like this post, buy me an espresso. Paypal Payment
Marhalim Abas: Shah Alam

View Comments (115)

  • If you want to put your laundry out in the public, please tell the complete picture.

    I want to know exactly which party that wants a major design change after at so many hulls already been laid down. What I know is that it was not BND that requested it.

    If option 1 & 2 is chosen, then the 2 completed mini frigates would be one of the most expensive ships in the world, with a cost of RM4.5 billion each.

    What a shame.

  • IMO we cannot afford to waste RM9 billion on just 2 completed ships.

    The Gowind Frigate basic design is IMO a good design for TLDM. We need to fork out the money to complete all 6 ships. If we do need to top up to complete all 6, at most the cost would go to around RM1.8 billion each from the designed price of RM1.5 billion each.

    I would prefer that we have at least 9 Gowinds to afford to always put 3 ships out at sea. If we get just 2, then we will need to get yet another design to fulfill the ASW frigate role.

  • Is that mean only 1st and 2nd ship will be in service? How about the rest? It is possible to cancel or scrap even the construction ready take place?

  • Lets laughing with other people in the neighbourhood. This case will make Malaysia more stupid than donkey but somebody walk away with thick wallet. Meanwhile the rest of Malaysian are humiliated.

    It is not an accident but it was planned to fail.

  • Well, if truth that needs to be said is distasteful to some parties, I see with my jaundiced eye that (1) Malaysia is not ready to build its own naval ships 'properly' and that (2) perhaps there're other Malaysian concerns that could have build the ship's ...yet aren't considered at all because they don't seem to belong to any lobby or bloc that shares any rich pickings with its associates. I disliked this idea that any big project should be commandeered and managed by the politicians, the ministry and the retired defence officers who helmed the naval shipyards. This fiasco is off repeated much like there's no other musical genres that can be played by the naval brass band. Can we put a stop to this? And have all our ships either build overseas or in-country by those that's capable, in deed ...not by those with the biggest trumpets? Or are we just a bunch of losers perpetually honwinked by 'clowns' in starched uniforms and blundering ministers?

  • Dekat FB dah maki hamun BND siap digelar Bastard.

    But do they really know of the full story?? Was it fully BND was at fault or are there plenty of other parties that caused the delay?

  • Indeed this would be the most expensive 3100 tone warship right now. For that USD1 billion per LCS we could get a FREMM.......

    Indonesians would laugh terribly at us, seriously. 4 or 5 ships out of 6 is acceptable but 2 is kinda hurmmmm.

    Maybe RMN would start to consider a USD250 million fully armed Kedah.

  • Taib - “Or are we just a bunch of losers perpetually honwinked by ‘clowns’ in starched uniforms and blundering ministers?

    As in fond of saying : we have a tendency to repeat the same mistakes over and over again; the LCS cock up is just one in the long list of programmes in which the end user didn’t get something on time and within budget and the taxpayer his/her money’s worth.

    Luke other things the LCS was intended to benefit the country in various ways - ensuring the RMN got the desired capability was secondary. It was the local industry which had the final say on various aspects; not the end user. To justify building the ships locally the politicians denuded themselves into believing we could actually export them at a later date.

    Unless there is a genuine desire to change things; we’ll just go on and in repeating the same mistakes and we’ll have no one to blame but ourselves.