X

Defence industry, a look down South

PETALING JAYA: Posted below is an AFP story, on the arms industry of our southern neighbour, Singapore. I am not stating that the story tell us the whole story but its very instructive to our aspirations and dreams. To me, personally and I could be wrong here, at the end of the day, the defence budget of a country will be the main indicator of the country’s indigenous arms industry and not the other way round.
Just look at the US, India, China, Russia and even Singapore’s defence budget!

Singapore gains toehold in world arms industry
SINGAPORE: Singapore, better known for its clean-cut image and electronics exports, is seeking a place in the global arms industry by exploiting technological expertise honed on its own amply funded military.

From armoured personnel carriers used by British forces in Afghanistan to ammunition and firearms, the city-state is trying to enlarge the overseas market for its homegrown weapons and defence systems.

Its arms exports were in the limelight recently when India’s defence ministry banned six weapons manufacturers for alleged involvement in a 2009 bribery case — one of them a relatively little-known company from Singapore.

ST Kinetics, part of the multibillion-dollar ST Engineering industrial group, swiftly and vigorously denied the accusation but the mere mention of the firm underscored Singapore’s growing ambitions in the world arms market.

Singapore’s Straits Times newspaper said ST Kinetics was bidding for a contract to supply India with howitzers when the process was put on hold over the bribery allegations.

Its parent ST Engineering, with revenues of Sg$5.99 billion ($4.72 billion) in 2011, was the only Southeast Asian firm on the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s list of the world’s top 100 defence manufacturers released last month.

Partly owned by state investment agency Temasek Holdings, ST Engineering dominates the defence industry in Singapore. It says it is one of the world’s top suppliers of 40mm ammunition as well as portable weapons like its CIS 40mm Automatic Grenade Launcher.

The company was the biggest exhibitor at last month’s Singapore Airshow where among the equipment on display was a new version of the Bronco, an armoured all-terrain troop carrier used by British forces in Afghanistan.

As soon as this picture was taken someone says no pictures please! Oops. ST Engineering Warthog

“Our things are battle-proven. If you need something special, we can also customise to give you an edge over other people,” Patrick Choy, executive vice-president for international marketing at ST Engineering, told AFP at the show.

The British Army’s 115 Broncos — first deployed in Afghanistan in 2010 and dubbed the “Warthogs” — are ST Engineering’s pride, and billed as the first armoured vehicles built for a Western army by an Asian firm.

Britain has around 9,500 troops in Afghanistan, the second-largest foreign contingent after the US troops in the coalition, operating in the the difficult terrain of Helmand province.

Jon Grevatt, a defence specialist for IHS Jane’s, a global security think tank, said the firm “has done a grand job with the Bronco” but noted that “the British Army heavily customised it to suit its operational needs in Afghanistan”.

Beyond Britain, ST Engineering exports weapons and military equipment to other countries but refuses to divulge details.

According to the Stockholm institute, Singapore has sold defence products to Indonesia, Chad, Nigeria, the Philippines, the United Arab Emirates and Brazil since 2000, generating $1.75 billion in 2010 alone.

Despite its diverse customer profile, ST Engineering is still heavily dependent on the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF), Grevatt said.

Massive defence budget

Singapore has the largest defence budget in Southeast Asia, thanks to public funds generated by its phenomenal economic growth. It has set aside Sg$12.28 billion ($9.68 billion) for defence in 2012, at 24.4 percent the largest single allocation in the government’s total budget.

Surrounded by far larger neighbours, Singapore has pursued a robust defence strategy since its acrimonious split with Malaysia in 1965, and was initially advised by Israel.

All able-bodied Singaporean men are required to devote two years of full-time military service upon turning 18, providing additional manpower on top of the estimated 20,000 armed forces regulars.

“As a defence manufacturer ST is driven largely by what the SAF needs… which is still conventional systems,” Grevatt said.

“ST’s conventional land systems for the SAF will be difficult to sell outside Singapore because several factors are against it… the Western market is in decline and conflicts are also winding down.”

However, ST Engineering’s non-defence sectors contribute about 60 percent of revenues, with the diverse portfolio bolstering growth potential, he added.

Apart from its defence business, the company has worldwide operations in commercial land systems, aerospace, the marine industry and engineering, with over 100 subsidiaries in 23 countries.

Its aviation arm ST Aerospace is the largest independent aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul provider in the world.

“Defence manufacturers today have to be diverse and have their fingers in many pies to survive,” Grevatt said.

– AFP

– Malaysian Defence

If you like this post, buy me an espresso. Paypal Payment
Marhalim Abas: Shah Alam

View Comments (30)

  • I think we should produced more and more local made weapons and our focus should be on designing light vehicle and apcs or maybe a light multi-role tank perhaps.. and export it to 3rd world country as first step, if proton & perodua can , how come the army can't? If they are political barrier just ignored it, Kick the opposition away from political table if nessasary , The opposition expecially from D and PK are puppets of Singapore and Backup by Israeli who never wanted to see muslim nation advanced in Military

    Reply
    Its not about the opposition its not having enough funds to develop the armed forces let alone to bring up the local arms industry

  • IMO now Sings & Indonesia have better quality of military related industries compared to us, as we rely on "everything" COTS made in outside SEA.

  • The Singapore defence industries is successful because it is fully funded and supported by the Singapore government.We cannot compare with them because ours are privately-owned except for CTRM etc.There is no incentive for our businessmen to innovate new products because firstly you need a lot of money, secondly the uncertainty of success due to product acceptability.So why take unnecessary risks?

    We still could have built a credible MAF without the need to have export-oriented defence industries.The money allocated to defence spending the last few Malaysian Plans would have given us a good military capability if only we are honest with what we should buy for the MAF to enable the soldiers, sailors and airmen to do their job of defending this nation, rather than buying things which end- up as white elephants and useless to the MAF.

    Reply
    http://youtu.be/SuFScoO4tb0

  • Perhaps the following article will shed some light on why the defence industry in Malaysia is so miserably inadequate. (I can not confirm the information contained in the article, and neither do I necessarily endorse its contents)...

    Reply
    I deleted the link as I do not want to give free publicity to some politician. Moreover its not just that simple. Cut out the graft and we will have a great arms industry? See the next comment...

  • It is very hard for non Euro and non US defence companies to survive based on external orders alone as these US and Euro companies have become very dominant and powerful. Hence, domestic orders will have to compensate. So, the state will have to decide which products it wants produced in house and which it wants to buy externally. That requires a lot of state coordination for precision and quality and calls for consolidation for the smallish disparate companies. Better still; ensure the state owns and runs the consolidated company.

  • The other point I would like to make is that small privately run companies are more exposed to espionage and covert deals which may be against the interest of the state. It becomes worse when the state buys from these companies. My two cents.

  • Oh, I totally agree with Tomahawk's points. And I also agree that is not as simple as just cutting graft. Nonetheless graft serves to distort and pervert the local defense industry in ways that undermine its development. Just throwing some "information" out there. And I'm not so naive as to believe everything I read..

    Rep
    Sorry I was not implying that you are naïve.

  • TDM made a mistake by privatizing the defence industries.
    It was during his time as the PM that AIROD,SMEO,SMEA and ATSC were privatized.
    He believed all business including the defence industries should be run by businessmen.
    Later DEFTECH, ZETRO, SAPURA and BHIC followed suit with their own defence industry specializaton.
    Without economy of scale, such defence industry modality will not take off.
    We should not follow the American and European companies (which are not funded by their governments) and hope to be successful because they unlike us have access to the global market.

    I think there is no need for Malaysia to excel in the defence industries.
    It is better for our local companies to concentrate on becoming more self-sufficient and effective in maintenance support to keep our military hardware in tip-top condition with minimum cost to the nation.

    Reply
    Only Airod and SMEO were privatised. SMEA and ATSC were set up by Airod and SMEO as subsidiary companies

  • agree with tomahawk...perhaps we can JV with Sings and Indos to make ASEAN-specific military stuff.

    Reply
    We must get past the trust and who will benefit the most issues even before we can start to sit down.